Return to: Medical School: Academic Health Center : U of M Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota. Home page.
 

Introduction to Research

Faculty Research

Faculty Searches

Research Safety

Biomedical Image Processing Laboratory (BIPL)

Introduction to Education

Undergraduate Program

Graduate Program

Related Programs

Course Offerings

Seminar Series

Colloquium Series

Conferences and Symposia

Introduction to Community Outreach

Brain Awareness Week

BrainScience on the Move

Neuroscience at the Minnesota State Fair

Office/Administrative Staff

Other Neuroscience Websites

PubMed



Google


WWW
Neuroscience
 
Neuroscience Homepage  > Faculty List > Ghose

Geoffrey M. Ghose, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor, Department of Neuroscience
ghose002@umn.edu; link to lab web page

Strategies in Visual Cortex.

The cerebral cortex embodies an interesting dichotomy in the representation of information: on the one hand it must maintain a consistent and reliable representation of important information, and on the other hand it must be able to modify representations to adapt and learn. My broad research interest is how the cortex addresses these two potentially conflicting requirements. In particular I am interested in how strategies based on past experiences are used in the processing and execution of visually guided behavior.

Understanding how and why representations change in visual cortex will provide a powerful basis for studying a number of general issues concerning cortical information processing, including the interactions between behavior and sensation, the mechanisms underlying learning and development, and the neural coding of information.

Figure 1(above). Orientation change detection task. a, Stimuli of a typical trial. Animals fixated on a central spot throughout the trial (cross). Stimuli were located at four different locations: two adjacent locations within the receptive field (oval, positions 1 and 2) and opposite the receptive field (positions 3 and 4). If the animal was cued to attend to position 2 (an 'attend in' location), it would have to release a lever when a change happened at this location (middle and right panels), while ignoring the change at position 4 (left and middle panels). Attentional modulation was measured by comparing responses for visually identical trials in which the animal attended to different locations. b, Orientation changes occurred at random times after stimulus onset according to the indicated probability distribution. c, The behaviourally relevant probability is the probability that a change will occur at a given point in time given that one has not occurred already (hazard function). The hazard function is zero for the first 500 ms (no changes occurred) and then rises to a maximum 2.25 s after stimulus presentation.

Selected Publications
Ghose GM.
Strategies optimize the detection of motion transients.
J Vis. 2006 May 10;6(4):429-40.
Ghose GM.
Learning in mammalian sensory cortex.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Aug;14(4):513-8. Review.
Ghose GM, Maunsell JH.
Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing.
Nature. 2002 Oct 10;419(6907):616-20
Ghose GM, Yang T, Maunsell JH.
Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2.
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;87(4):1867-88
Ghose GM, Maunsell J.
Specialized representations in visual cortex: a role for binding?
Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):79-85, 111-25
DeAngelis GC, Ghose GM, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD.
Functional micro-organization of primary visual cortex: receptive field analysis of nearby neurons.
J Neurosci. 1999 May 15;19(10):4046-64
Maunsell JH, Ghose GM, Assad JA, McAdams CJ, Boudreau CE, Noerager BD.
Visual response latencies of magnocellular and parvocellular LGN neurons in macaque monkeys.
Vis Neurosci. 1999 Jan-Feb;16(1):1-14
Ghose GM, Ts'o DY.
Form processing modules in primate area V4.
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Apr;77(4):2191-6
 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.